Posted on March 5, 2008 by Steve
I’ve been trying to figure out a way to get into a topic I’ve been reading into for quite a while now, but it’s so deep and I’m so shallow. The issue is the so-called New Perspective on Paul. The Paul Page has some extraordinary articles describing it (start with Mattison’s summary), and so what [...]
Filed under: Eschatology, Preterism, Reformed Theology, Theology | Tagged: Eschatology, Preterism, Theology | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 29, 2008 by Steve
In this week’s installment of Theology Unplugged, a podcast I highly recommend, Reclaiming the Mind Ministries president Michael Patton made the following comments about full preterists (like myself):
Now I would say, you can believe that, and you can make your arguments — and many people do from Scripture. I’m not persuaded at all [...]
Filed under: Hermeneutics, Preterism, Reformed Theology, Theology | 2 Comments »
Posted on February 28, 2008 by Steve
In my explanation of man’s depravity from the view of a recurring, individualized (non-historical) Fall, I have argued that mankind’s natural separation from God was in origin a result of natural self-preservation instincts. These instincts progressed first into childish selfishness and then, with the onset of divinely gifted God-consciousness (Romans 1:18-21), those instincts gone unchecked [...]
Filed under: Origins debate, Theology | 2 Comments »
Posted on February 23, 2008 by Steve
Recently I heard a theologian talking about Job and was not surprised to hear him refer to Job’s “so-called friends”. Not surprised perhaps, but as usual when I hear this common sentiment, I was uncomfortable with it. Were Job’s friends there to give him a hard time? Were they there just so they could make [...]
Filed under: General, Theology | Tagged: Theology | Leave a Comment »
Posted on February 20, 2008 by Steve
In a recent post on his popular blog, Al Mohler, the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, presented a predictable take on the origins debate. He states,
I have not said that one can’t be a Christian and believe in evolution. It is entirely possible to be a confused Christian or a confused evolutionist . [...]
Filed under: Origins debate, Science, Theology | 3 Comments »
Posted on February 18, 2008 by Steve
I realized long after the fact that ElShaddai at He is Sufficient tagged me with a Bible meme.
Here’s my shot at it.
1. What translation of the Bible do you like best? NET or NIV (I know, I know, ElShaddai…)
2. Old or New Testament? Gosh! Do I have to choose? You can’t beat Isaiah for good [...]
Filed under: Scripture, Theology | Tagged: fun | 1 Comment »
Posted on February 14, 2008 by Steve
This is the eighth and final post in a series on inspiration, inerrancy, and hermeneutics.
Part 1: “All or “every” Scripture?
Part 2: What is inspiration?
Part 3: The nature of inspiration and the purpose of Scripture
Part 4: Inerrancy vs. infallibility
Part 5: The literary-generic principle
Part 6: The authority of Scripture
Part 7: Case study: the Fall
So anyway what about [...]
Filed under: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | Tagged: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | 6 Comments »
Posted on February 10, 2008 by Steve
How the death that Adam experienced because of his sin was passed on to all his descendants has been explained in various ways: the federal view says that Adam’s fall from God’s favor was effective for all humanity because he was the “head” of the race.
…Tolkien wrote a remarkable set of etiological myths in the first few chapters of the Silmarillion , but what we glean from his stories tells us mainly about his view of God and the universe, and not at all about the true-to-life historical particulars of our own universe, or the purpose of man in this world, etc.
Filed under: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | Tagged: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | 14 Comments »
Posted on February 8, 2008 by Steve
This is the sixth of a series of posts on inspiration, inerrancy, and hermeneutics.
Part 1: “All or “every” Scripture?
Part 2: What is inspiration?
Part 3: The nature of inspiration and the purpose of Scripture
Part 4: Inerrancy vs. infallibility
Part 5: The literary-generic principle
Preliminary Remarks The purpose of these next few posts is to examine my perspective of [...]
Filed under: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | Tagged: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | 8 Comments »
Posted on January 20, 2008 by Steve
This is the fifth of a series of posts on inspiration, inerrancy, and hermeneutics.
Part 1: “All or “every” Scripture?
Part 2: What is inspiration?
Part 3: The nature of inspiration and the purpose of Scripture
Part 4: Inerrancy vs. infallibility
The Importance of Determining Genre
Because the Bible is a compilation of literary works, in order to get the sense [...]
Filed under: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | Tagged: Hermeneutics, Scripture, Theology | 4 Comments »