Comments for Undeception http://undeception.wordpress.com Test everything; hold fast to that which is good. Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:58:42 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on About this blog and its author by Greg Simon http://undeception.wordpress.com/about/#comment-445 Greg Simon Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:58:42 +0000 #comment-445 Hi Stephen I think you have a great blog. I noticed that you link to my old site. With the closing of Geocities, and my procrastinatory prowess, all such links are now dead. You are more than welcome to update it to newearthcs.com if you like it, or remove it if you don't, but at the moment it goes nowhere at great speed. God bless, Greg Hi Stephen

I think you have a great blog. I noticed that you link to my old site. With the closing of Geocities, and my procrastinatory prowess, all such links are now dead. You are more than welcome to update it to newearthcs.com if you like it, or remove it if you don’t, but at the moment it goes nowhere at great speed.

God bless,
Greg

]]> Comment on About this blog and its author by Cleveland http://undeception.wordpress.com/about/#comment-444 Cleveland Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:55:02 +0000 #comment-444 HI Stephen, Ran across your blog and when I read that you were from Georgia my ears perked up because my original homebase was in Thomaston Georgia just north of Perry. Enjoyed reading your post and would enjoy hearing from you. I pastor the Pavillion UMC in Wyoming. If you wonder how I ended up here write me a line and I will share my story. Pastor Cleve HI Stephen,

Ran across your blog and when I read that you were from Georgia my ears perked up because my original homebase was in Thomaston Georgia just north of Perry. Enjoyed reading your post and would enjoy hearing from you. I pastor the Pavillion UMC in Wyoming. If you wonder how I ended up here write me a line and I will share my story.
Pastor Cleve

]]> Comment on Audience relevance = personal relevance by Alexwebmaster http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/audience-relevance-is-personal-relevance/#comment-440 Alexwebmaster Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:56:11 +0000 http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/09/26/audience-relevance-is-personal-relevance/#comment-440 Hello webmaster I would like to share with you a link to your site write me here preonrelt@mail.ru Hello webmaster
I would like to share with you a link to your site
write me here preonrelt@mail.ru

]]> Comment on Search and rescue…or invasion and annexation? by Paul’s Epistles to the Thessalonians Follow-Up « The Smoak House http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-438 Paul’s Epistles to the Thessalonians Follow-Up « The Smoak House Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:28:19 +0000 http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-438 [...] This rapture, according to futurist eschatology, will be the first in a series of events that will lead to a new heavens and new earth. It will be followed by the “great tribulation” in which the antichrist will rise to power and then Christ’s second coming (which I guess it’s actually a 3rd coming) will happen and he will defeat the beast/antichrist and Satan and pretty much everybody else besides believers and then He’s reign for a thousand years, and then Satan will show up again (cf. Revelation 20) and then he’ll be defeated again. My definition, then, is that initial ascension of living and dead believers. Granted there are differing opinions as when this will happen, relative to the tribulation, but I have described here the pretrib definition since it seems to be the most popular (e.g. Left Behind). There is a great article that describes a different view of what Paul meant by “meet the Lord in the air” over at Undeception. [...] [...] This rapture, according to futurist eschatology, will be the first in a series of events that will lead to a new heavens and new earth. It will be followed by the “great tribulation” in which the antichrist will rise to power and then Christ’s second coming (which I guess it’s actually a 3rd coming) will happen and he will defeat the beast/antichrist and Satan and pretty much everybody else besides believers and then He’s reign for a thousand years, and then Satan will show up again (cf. Revelation 20) and then he’ll be defeated again. My definition, then, is that initial ascension of living and dead believers. Granted there are differing opinions as when this will happen, relative to the tribulation, but I have described here the pretrib definition since it seems to be the most popular (e.g. Left Behind). There is a great article that describes a different view of what Paul meant by “meet the Lord in the air” over at Undeception. [...]

]]> Comment on Search and rescue…or invasion and annexation? by Paul’s Epistles to the Thessalonians Follow-Up « http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-437 Paul’s Epistles to the Thessalonians Follow-Up « Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:35:03 +0000 http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/search-and-rescueor-invasion-and-annexation/#comment-437 [...] This rapture, according to futurist eschatology, will be the first in a series of events that will lead to a new heavens and new earth. It will be followed by the “great tribulation” in which the antichrist will rise to power and then Christ’s second coming (which I guess it’s actually a 3rd coming) will happen and he will defeat the beast/antichrist and Satan and pretty much everybody else besides believers and then He’s reign for a thousand years, and then Satan will show up again (cf. Revelation 20) and then he’ll be defeated again. My definition, then, is that initial ascension of living and dead believers. Granted there are differing opinions as when this will happen, relative to the tribulation, but I have described here the pretrib definition since it seems to be the most popular (e.g. Left Behind). There is a great article that describes a different view of what Paul meant by “meet the Lord in the air” over at Undeception. [...] [...] This rapture, according to futurist eschatology, will be the first in a series of events that will lead to a new heavens and new earth. It will be followed by the “great tribulation” in which the antichrist will rise to power and then Christ’s second coming (which I guess it’s actually a 3rd coming) will happen and he will defeat the beast/antichrist and Satan and pretty much everybody else besides believers and then He’s reign for a thousand years, and then Satan will show up again (cf. Revelation 20) and then he’ll be defeated again. My definition, then, is that initial ascension of living and dead believers. Granted there are differing opinions as when this will happen, relative to the tribulation, but I have described here the pretrib definition since it seems to be the most popular (e.g. Left Behind). There is a great article that describes a different view of what Paul meant by “meet the Lord in the air” over at Undeception. [...]

]]> Comment on Caution: not for the close-minded by Interpreting the Bible « http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/caution-not-for-the-close-minded/#comment-436 Interpreting the Bible « Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:34:39 +0000 http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/09/24/caution-not-for-the-close-minded/#comment-436 [...] As a constant source of debate and outright argument among believers, the Revelation of Jesus Christ has been interpreted and reinterpreted and its imagery has been under constant scrutiny as everyone attempts to identify the strange beings and beasts within its pages. I believe that understanding not only the date of Revelation (which is another topic entirely), but the audience to whom it was written is the key to understanding what St. John was attempting to convey. In the opening chapter we see that John sees a vision of the ascended Christ who begins showing the Apostle things that “must shortly take place (Revelation 1:1).” Chapter 1 goes on to tell us plainly who the author’s audience is–the seven churches which are in Asia. These were real churches facing real issues. They are the ones who were to receive comfort from this amazing vision given to John. For modern believers who apply the contents of this mysterious book of the Bible to their own lives and circumstances do a great disservice to themselves and provide false hope to those to whom they teach such a faulty interpretation of Revelation. You can read more about this in a great article over at Undeception. [...] [...] As a constant source of debate and outright argument among believers, the Revelation of Jesus Christ has been interpreted and reinterpreted and its imagery has been under constant scrutiny as everyone attempts to identify the strange beings and beasts within its pages. I believe that understanding not only the date of Revelation (which is another topic entirely), but the audience to whom it was written is the key to understanding what St. John was attempting to convey. In the opening chapter we see that John sees a vision of the ascended Christ who begins showing the Apostle things that “must shortly take place (Revelation 1:1).” Chapter 1 goes on to tell us plainly who the author’s audience is–the seven churches which are in Asia. These were real churches facing real issues. They are the ones who were to receive comfort from this amazing vision given to John. For modern believers who apply the contents of this mysterious book of the Bible to their own lives and circumstances do a great disservice to themselves and provide false hope to those to whom they teach such a faulty interpretation of Revelation. You can read more about this in a great article over at Undeception. [...]

]]> Comment on I’ve moved to Undeception.com by Morrison Lee http://undeception.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/ive-moved-to-undeceptioncom/#comment-434 Morrison Lee Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:30:15 +0000 http://undeception.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-434 Repeated from 'undeceptionwordpress' Morrison Lee, on July 6th, 2008 at 6:24 am Said: Hi Steven, May I ask your email address? I like your website. My view is called ‘Rational Preterism’ , which is full Preterism with a critical and thorough-going epistemology under it. By any objective measure Futurism is as out of court as Geocentrism, and Preterism is as defensible as Copernicanism. I have collected over forty conditons for a rationally -satisfactory theory of endtimes. Futurism does not meet one. Preterism ticks off all forty! I have also devised three experiments anyone can perform which compare the: logic, basis and factual foundation of each. The results are visual and repeatable, and overwhelmingly affirm Preterism as preferable rationally. I am based in Seoul. Kind regards, Morrison Lee Repeated from ‘undeceptionwordpress’

Morrison Lee, on July 6th, 2008 at 6:24 am Said:
Hi Steven,
May I ask your email address? I like your website. My view is called ‘Rational Preterism’ , which is full Preterism with a critical and thorough-going epistemology under it. By any objective measure Futurism is as out of court as Geocentrism, and Preterism is as defensible as Copernicanism. I have collected over forty conditons for a rationally -satisfactory theory of endtimes. Futurism does not meet one. Preterism ticks off all forty! I have also devised three experiments anyone can perform which compare the: logic, basis and factual foundation of each. The results are visual and repeatable, and overwhelmingly affirm Preterism as preferable rationally. I am based in Seoul.

Kind regards,
Morrison Lee

]]> Comment on About this blog and its author by Morrison Lee http://undeception.wordpress.com/about/#comment-433 Morrison Lee Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:24:52 +0000 #comment-433 Hi Steven, May I ask your email address? I like your website. My view is called 'Rational Preterism' , which is full Preterism with a critical and thorough-going epistemology under it. By any objective measure Futurism is as out of court as Geocentrism, and Preterism is as defensible as Copernicanism. I have collected over forty conditons for a rationally -satisfactory theory of endtimes. Futurism does not meet one. Preterism ticks off all forty! I have also devised three experiments anyone can perform which compare the: logic, basis and factual foundation of each. The results are visual and repeatable, and overwhelmingly affirm Preterism as preferable rationally. I am based in Seoul. Kind regards, Morrison Lee Hi Steven,
May I ask your email address? I like your website. My view is called ‘Rational Preterism’ , which is full Preterism with a critical and thorough-going epistemology under it. By any objective measure Futurism is as out of court as Geocentrism, and Preterism is as defensible as Copernicanism. I have collected over forty conditons for a rationally -satisfactory theory of endtimes. Futurism does not meet one. Preterism ticks off all forty! I have also devised three experiments anyone can perform which compare the: logic, basis and factual foundation of each. The results are visual and repeatable, and overwhelmingly affirm Preterism as preferable rationally. I am based in Seoul.

Kind regards,
Morrison Lee

]]> Comment on MYSTERIES OF MY FIELD OF STUDY REVEALED: the Indo-Europeans by mathilda37 http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/mysteries-of-my-field-of-study-revealed-the-indo-europeans/#comment-432 mathilda37 Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:45:23 +0000 http://undeception.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/mysteries-of-my-field-of-study-revealed-the-indo-europeans/#comment-432 I think they are looking at the mesolithic Turks as the source of Indo European languages, they seem to have spread about the same time as the Neolithic expansion from Turkey (it wasn't from the near East!!!) took place. This would have made the Harappans Indo European. Can't say why the North Africans stuch with Afro Asiatic though, the same population expanded into there too. I think they are looking at the mesolithic Turks as the source of Indo European languages, they seem to have spread about the same time as the Neolithic expansion from Turkey (it wasn’t from the near East!!!) took place.

This would have made the Harappans Indo European.

Can’t say why the North Africans stuch with Afro Asiatic though, the same population expanded into there too.

]]> Comment on “All” or “every” Scripture? by Undeception » “All” or “every” Scripture? http://undeception.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/all-or-every-scripture/#comment-430 Undeception » “All” or “every” Scripture? Tue, 27 May 2008 14:32:27 +0000 http://undeception.wordpress.com/2008/01/04/all-or-every-scripture/#comment-430 [...] the specializing qualifier hiera to specify holy “letters” or “learning”[2]. Therefore, if we take theopneustos as attributive (as I argued above), we have parallel phrases [...] [...] the specializing qualifier hiera to specify holy “letters” or “learning”[2]. Therefore, if we take theopneustos as attributive (as I argued above), we have parallel phrases [...]

]]>